CPU vs GPU inference for small models under 7B

CPU vs GPU for LLM inference comparison

Graphics processing units (GPUs) are faster at inference. That is the short version. The long version is about how much faster, and when it stops mattering.

A mid-range GPU generates tokens five to ten times faster than a strong central processing unit (CPU) on the same model, because matrix math is what GPUs are built for. But CPUs hold two advantages: memory capacity and price. A workstation with 128GB of RAM can load a 70B model at low quantization. No consumer GPU can. It will produce a few tokens per second, which suits batch jobs and punishes chat.

The practical split: for interactive chat, buy a GPU and size the model to its video memory (VRAM). For overnight batch work like summarization and extraction, a big-RAM CPU box is remarkably cost-effective. Apple Silicon blurs the line with one large unified memory pool. Match the hardware to how you will actually use it. Compare setups for your use case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AMD RX 9070 XT for Local LLMs: ROCm Performance Guide (2026)

llama.cpp flash attention: how to enable and benchmark

SillyTavern with Local LLMs: Complete Setup for AI Companions