NFS vs SMB for AI Model Storage: Network File System Guide
When your model library grows to hundreds of gigabytes, local storage per machine becomes impractical. Network storage — either NFS or SMB — lets multiple AI workstations share a central model repository. The choice between NFS and SMB affects model load times and inference performance significantly.
NFS vs SMB Performance for LLMs
NFS (Network File System) consistently outperforms SMB for large sequential reads — the pattern of loading model weight files. NFS v4.2 with rsize=1048576 achieves ~85-90% of theoretical network bandwidth. SMB3 on Linux clients achieves ~70-80%. For a 10GbE network, NFS reads a 7B GGUF model (4GB) in ~3-4 seconds vs SMB's ~5-6 seconds. Over a workday, this difference is barely noticeable, but for frequent model switching it adds up.
Caching Strategy
Once a model is loaded into GPU VRAM, network storage speed is irrelevant for inference. The bottleneck is only at model load time. Keep your most-used models in local NVMe storage and use network storage for the archive. Ollama's model cache directory can be set to local NVMe while network storage serves as the download/import location. RAM caching (Linux page cache) keeps recently-accessed models in memory — models accessed within the last hour often load from RAM, not disk.
Practical Setup
Recommended setup: NAS with 10GbE (Synology or QNAP) running NFS v4, mounted on AI workstations. Export options: rw,sync,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash for a trusted local network. Mount with rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,hard,timeo=600 for optimal performance. ZFS on the NAS provides integrity checking for model files — bit flips in model weights cause subtle inference errors that are difficult to diagnose without file integrity verification.
Comments
Post a Comment