Phi-4 Mini vs Phi-3 Medium: Microsoft's Compact LLM Compared
Microsoft's Phi series has consistently punched above its weight class. Phi-4 Mini (3.8B) outperforms models twice its size on reasoning tasks. Here's the full comparison and local setup guide.
Phi-4 Mini vs Phi-3 Medium: Key Differences
| Model | Params | Context | MMLU | HumanEval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phi-4 Mini | 3.8B | 128K | 70.9 | 82.1 |
| Phi-3 Medium | 14B | 128K | 78.0 | 70.2 |
| Phi-3 Mini | 3.8B | 128K | 68.8 | 58.1 |
Why Phi-4 Mini Outperforms on Coding
Microsoft trained Phi-4 Mini on a heavily curated dataset weighted toward coding, math, and reasoning-dense content. The HumanEval score of 82.1 at 3.8B parameters is extraordinary — comparable to GPT-3.5 Turbo and beating most 7B models.
This makes Phi-4 Mini an ideal on-device model. At Q4 quantization (~2.3 GB), it runs at 80–120 tokens/sec on most modern CPUs and 200+ tokens/sec on an RTX 3060. Hardware speed comparisons are available at LLMHardware.io.
Running Phi-4 Mini Locally
# Via Ollama
ollama pull phi4-mini
ollama run phi4-mini "Write a merge sort in Python"
# Via llama.cpp
./llama-cli -m phi-4-mini-Q4_K_M.gguf -p "You are a helpful coding assistant.
User: Write a binary search tree
Assistant:" -n 512 --repeat-penalty 1.1
Best Use Cases for Phi-4 Mini
- Code completion and explanation on CPU-only machines
- Embedded AI in applications with strict memory constraints
- Raspberry Pi 5 and Apple Silicon MacBook inference
- Batch processing tasks where speed matters more than quality
For tasks requiring deep reasoning or long-form generation, the larger Phi-3 Medium (14B) still wins. But for the 3.8B tier, Phi-4 Mini is unambiguously the best option available in 2026.

Comments
Post a Comment