Phi-4 Mini vs Phi-3 Medium: Microsoft's Compact LLM Compared

Phi-4 Mini vs Phi-3 Medium: Microsoft's Compact LLM Compared

Microsoft's Phi series has consistently punched above its weight class. Phi-4 Mini (3.8B) outperforms models twice its size on reasoning tasks. Here's the full comparison and local setup guide.

Phi-4 Mini vs Phi-3 Medium: Key Differences

ModelParamsContextMMLUHumanEval
Phi-4 Mini3.8B128K70.982.1
Phi-3 Medium14B128K78.070.2
Phi-3 Mini3.8B128K68.858.1

Why Phi-4 Mini Outperforms on Coding

Microsoft trained Phi-4 Mini on a heavily curated dataset weighted toward coding, math, and reasoning-dense content. The HumanEval score of 82.1 at 3.8B parameters is extraordinary — comparable to GPT-3.5 Turbo and beating most 7B models.

This makes Phi-4 Mini an ideal on-device model. At Q4 quantization (~2.3 GB), it runs at 80–120 tokens/sec on most modern CPUs and 200+ tokens/sec on an RTX 3060. Hardware speed comparisons are available at LLMHardware.io.

Running Phi-4 Mini Locally

# Via Ollama
ollama pull phi4-mini
ollama run phi4-mini "Write a merge sort in Python"

# Via llama.cpp
./llama-cli   -m phi-4-mini-Q4_K_M.gguf   -p "You are a helpful coding assistant.

User: Write a binary search tree
Assistant:"   -n 512 --repeat-penalty 1.1

Best Use Cases for Phi-4 Mini

  • Code completion and explanation on CPU-only machines
  • Embedded AI in applications with strict memory constraints
  • Raspberry Pi 5 and Apple Silicon MacBook inference
  • Batch processing tasks where speed matters more than quality

For tasks requiring deep reasoning or long-form generation, the larger Phi-3 Medium (14B) still wins. But for the 3.8B tier, Phi-4 Mini is unambiguously the best option available in 2026.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AMD RX 9070 XT for Local LLMs: ROCm Performance Guide (2026)

llama.cpp flash attention: how to enable and benchmark

SillyTavern with Local LLMs: Complete Setup for AI Companions