RTX 3090 vs RTX 4090 for Local LLM Inference: 2025 Comparison
The RTX 3090 and 4090 both offer 24GB VRAM — the threshold where most 13B-34B models fit entirely in GPU memory. The 4090 is significantly faster but costs $1700-2000 new. A used 3090 can be had for $600-800. Is the 4090's extra speed worth 2-3x the cost for local LLM users? The answer is nuanced.
Benchmark Comparison
On Llama 3.1 13B Q4_K_M: RTX 3090 achieves ~55-60 tokens/second, RTX 4090 achieves ~70-75 tokens/second — about 25% faster. On a 34B Q4_K_M (fits in 24GB): 3090 gets ~22 t/s vs 4090's ~28 t/s. For inference, the 4090 is faster but not dramatically so. For fine-tuning with QLoRA, the gap widens significantly because the 4090's faster compute matters more.
The Value Case for RTX 3090
At $650-800 used, the RTX 3090 is the best price-per-VRAM card available. You get 24GB for less than many 12GB cards cost new. The only caution: 3090s run very hot (330W TDP) and older cards in the used market may have worn thermal pads. Factor in a repaste job ($50-80 at a shop) for long-term reliability. The 3090 Ti offers slightly more bandwidth and compute for ~$100 more.
When the 4090 Is Worth It
Buy the 4090 if: you fine-tune models regularly, you run high-concurrency serving (the faster compute helps with batching), or you want the fastest single-GPU inference available. The 4090's lower power consumption (450W vs 350W rated, but 4090 throttles more efficiently under load) and better thermals also make it preferable for always-on server use. For occasional local chat use, the 3090 is the rational choice.
Comments
Post a Comment